Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Creating liberating content

Solana’s new Seeker phone...

Solana Mobile revealed it will ship its Seeker smartphone with a new token...

Coinbase under fire for...

Coinbase is facing sharp criticism and regulatory pressure after confirming a significant data...

The Proof-of-Security guard job...

DISCLAIMER: The below article is part of CryptoSlate’s initiative to align Bitcoin and...

Hong Kong advances stablecoin...

Hong Kong has passed a landmark bill to regulate fiat-backed stablecoins, signaling its...
HomeAnalysisTwo Prime drops...

Two Prime drops Ethereum, labeling it a memecoin amid waning institutional interest

Algorithmic trading firm Two Prime formally dropped its exposure to Ethereum (ETH), stating that ETH now trades as a memecoin rather than a predictable asset.

According to CEO Alexander Blume, the firm will now exclusively manage and lend against Bitcoin (BTC). He added that the firm believes that Bitcoin is the only digital asset that meets institutional standards for liquidity, predictability, and long-term investment viability.

The decision follows over a year of performance divergence between BTC and ETH, during which Two Prime had issued more than $1.5 billion in loans backed by Bitcoin and Ethereum through its lending division. 

Despite that exposure, the firm concluded that Ethereum’s current behavior no longer aligns with risk-adjusted return expectations suitable for institutional portfolios. 

Blume wrote:

“ETH’s statistical trading behavior, value proposition, and community culture have failed beyond a point worth engaging.”

De-correlation and elevated tail risk

A quantitative analysis cited by Two Prime shows that Ethereum’s volatility and return structure have decoupled from Bitcoin since the November 2024 US election. 

While Bitcoin has shown classic mean-reversion characteristics, suggesting investor confidence and dip-buying activity, ETH has continued to trend lower with limited rebounds. 

In scatterplots comparing 30-day returns with 30-day forward returns, ETH shows persistent negative momentum and lacks the symmetry observed in BTC data.

Additionally, ETH’s volatility now resembles that of memecoins like Dogecoin (DOGE). A comparison of 30-day range volatility across BTC, ETH, and DOGE shows that ETH has moved away from its historically moderate volatility profile, displaying sudden multi-standard deviation moves inconsistent with institutional-grade assets.

Weak institutional demand

Two Prime also pointed to a widening gap in institutional demand. Bitcoin ETFs currently manage over $113 billion in assets, consuming 5.76% of the total BTC supply. In contrast, ETH ETFs account for only $4.71 billion in assets, covering 2.22% of the ETH supply. 

Despite Ethereum’s high market capitalization, much of its ETF inflows may be offset by short futures in basis trades, further diluting real demand.

The disparity creates a reflexive environment where underperformance in ETH products leads asset managers to dedicate fewer resources to promotion, which in turn reduces visibility and investor allocation. 

According to Blume, ETH’s inability to maintain sustained institutional interest undermines its long-term viability as a core digital asset holding.

Erosion of Ethereum’s value proposition

Beyond trading behavior, Two Prime questioned Ethereum’s economic and technical model. 

The firm noted that newer alternatives, such as Solana (SOL), are increasingly challenging Ethereum’s attempt to serve as a general-purpose decentralized computing platform.

These new infrastructures offer faster transaction throughput, lower costs, and a better user experience in latency-sensitive applications like gaming and payments.

Blume further argued that Ethereum Layer-2 networks have cannibalized much of the value capture that was previously tied to the mainnet. In his assessment, the asset lacks a clear monetization model that can support its valuation and utility claims.

Governance and cultural headwinds

Two Prime’s decision also factors in what it characterizes as a deterioration in Ethereum’s governance and focus.

Blume described Ethereum’s internal structure as bureaucratic, ideologically rigid, and slow to adapt to competitive market conditions. He argued that Ethereum has prioritized egalitarian ideals over effective product development and market relevance.

While Bitcoin offers a focused, singular use case as a decentralized store of value, the firm now sees ETH as one among many speculative tech platforms with no durable edge.

Blume concluded:

“The issue for ETH and its leadership is that everyone but them seems to know that.”

The post Two Prime drops Ethereum, labeling it a memecoin amid waning institutional interest appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Get notified whenever we post something new!

spot_img

Create a website from scratch

Just drag and drop elements in a page to get started with BrandPR.

Continue reading

Solana’s new Seeker phone ships with SKR token as economic engine

Solana Mobile revealed it will ship its Seeker smartphone with a new token called SKR, which will serve as the “native token of the Solana Mobile economy,” according to a May 21 announcement. The firm also confirmed that the smartphone will...

Coinbase under fire for massive data breach affecting nearly 69,461 users

Coinbase is facing sharp criticism and regulatory pressure after confirming a significant data breach that exposed personal information of nearly 70,000 users. According to a filing with the Maine Attorney General’s Office, the breach affected 69,461 individuals, of whom 217...

The Proof-of-Security guard job that’s harder than mining Bitcoin blocks

DISCLAIMER: The below article is part of CryptoSlate’s initiative to align Bitcoin and crypto events with the front page of the Internet. Stories contain satirical elements and may contain fictitious names or quotes for entertainment purposes.  Virat Kohli refuses your...

Enjoy exclusive access to all of our content

Get an online subscription and you can unlock any article you come across.